Re: Proposal to close reagle-01, reagle-02 (substantive)

At 18:16 06/03/2003 +0000, Jeremy Carroll wrote:


>Brian, please prioritize discussion of this issue since
>it is critical path for WebOnt.
>
>Proposal to close reagle-01, reagle-02.
>
>Summary:
>  Use exc-c14n without comments throughout.
>  Suggest that parser should (but not SHOULD) canonicalize.

I thought we were defining the syntax and semantics of a langauge, and 
assuming a processing model.

If this will solve the webont problem, then can we say nothing at 
all?  They just have to make sure they use a canonicalising parser?

Brian