W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > March 2003

Re: call for agenda items for this weeks telecon (terminology)

From: Frank Manola <fmanola@mitre.org>
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2003 11:37:40 -0500
Message-ID: <3E64D654.F4CB96A2@mitre.org>
To: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
CC: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org

Graham Klyne wrote:
> 
> At 05:36 PM 2/28/03 -0500, Frank Manola wrote:
> >I'd also note that the Concepts text that's being cited here
> >
> >"A URI reference within an RDF graph (an RDF URI reference)..."
> >
> >seems to effectively equate "RDF URI Reference" with "a URI reference
> >within an RDF graph".  So is it a URI Reference or not?  Note that we're
> >talking about *syntax* here (this is the abstract syntax section), rather
> >than differences about what RDF chooses to use these things for (which
> >seems to me a separate issue).  So are RDF URI references *syntactically*
> >URI references or not? (I understand that not all URI references, e.g.
> >relative URIs, are legit as RDF URI references;  but I think we cover that)
> 
> In view of recent discussions, this is an error in Concepts which I'd
> overlooked.
> 
> I think it will be sorted in the handling of issue williams-02
> [http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#williams-02].
> 

You're probably right.  If you can remember, ping me particularly on how
you do this though, because I may need to update the Primer to
correspond.


-- 
Frank Manola                   The MITRE Corporation
202 Burlington Road, MS A345   Bedford, MA 01730-1420
mailto:fmanola@mitre.org       voice: 781-271-8147   FAX: 781-271-8752
Received on Tuesday, 4 March 2003 11:37:50 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:56:10 EDT