- From: Frank Manola <fmanola@mitre.org>
- Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2003 11:37:40 -0500
- To: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
- CC: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Graham Klyne wrote: > > At 05:36 PM 2/28/03 -0500, Frank Manola wrote: > >I'd also note that the Concepts text that's being cited here > > > >"A URI reference within an RDF graph (an RDF URI reference)..." > > > >seems to effectively equate "RDF URI Reference" with "a URI reference > >within an RDF graph". So is it a URI Reference or not? Note that we're > >talking about *syntax* here (this is the abstract syntax section), rather > >than differences about what RDF chooses to use these things for (which > >seems to me a separate issue). So are RDF URI references *syntactically* > >URI references or not? (I understand that not all URI references, e.g. > >relative URIs, are legit as RDF URI references; but I think we cover that) > > In view of recent discussions, this is an error in Concepts which I'd > overlooked. > > I think it will be sorted in the handling of issue williams-02 > [http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#williams-02]. > You're probably right. If you can remember, ping me particularly on how you do this though, because I may need to update the Primer to correspond. -- Frank Manola The MITRE Corporation 202 Burlington Road, MS A345 Bedford, MA 01730-1420 mailto:fmanola@mitre.org voice: 781-271-8147 FAX: 781-271-8752
Received on Tuesday, 4 March 2003 11:37:50 UTC