W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > March 2003

Re: call for agenda items for this weeks telecon (terminology)

From: Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2003 14:28:44 +0000
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20030304142711.038614f0@127.0.0.1>
To: Frank Manola <fmanola@mitre.org>
Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org

At 05:36 PM 2/28/03 -0500, Frank Manola wrote:
>I'd also note that the Concepts text that's being cited here
>
>"A URI reference within an RDF graph (an RDF URI reference)..."
>
>seems to effectively equate "RDF URI Reference" with "a URI reference 
>within an RDF graph".  So is it a URI Reference or not?  Note that we're 
>talking about *syntax* here (this is the abstract syntax section), rather 
>than differences about what RDF chooses to use these things for (which 
>seems to me a separate issue).  So are RDF URI references *syntactically* 
>URI references or not? (I understand that not all URI references, e.g. 
>relative URIs, are legit as RDF URI references;  but I think we cover that)

In view of recent discussions, this is an error in Concepts which I'd 
overlooked.

I think it will be sorted in the handling of issue williams-02 
[http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#williams-02].

#g



-------------------
Graham Klyne
<GK@NineByNine.org>
PGP: 0FAA 69FF C083 000B A2E9  A131 01B9 1C7A DBCA CB5E
Received on Tuesday, 4 March 2003 10:20:57 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:56:10 EDT