- From: Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>
- Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2003 14:28:44 +0000
- To: Frank Manola <fmanola@mitre.org>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
At 05:36 PM 2/28/03 -0500, Frank Manola wrote: >I'd also note that the Concepts text that's being cited here > >"A URI reference within an RDF graph (an RDF URI reference)..." > >seems to effectively equate "RDF URI Reference" with "a URI reference >within an RDF graph". So is it a URI Reference or not? Note that we're >talking about *syntax* here (this is the abstract syntax section), rather >than differences about what RDF chooses to use these things for (which >seems to me a separate issue). So are RDF URI references *syntactically* >URI references or not? (I understand that not all URI references, e.g. >relative URIs, are legit as RDF URI references; but I think we cover that) In view of recent discussions, this is an error in Concepts which I'd overlooked. I think it will be sorted in the handling of issue williams-02 [http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#williams-02]. #g ------------------- Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org> PGP: 0FAA 69FF C083 000B A2E9 A131 01B9 1C7A DBCA CB5E
Received on Tuesday, 4 March 2003 10:20:57 UTC