W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > June 2003

Re: Defining Arc?

From: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2003 09:04:23 -0500
Message-Id: <p0521060ebb064fa21a56@[]>
To: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org

>I am going through the editorial updates to the syntax WD and I got to:
>>  Does the RDF series need to define "arc"? The original RDF syntax says
>>  quite a lot: "directed labeled graphs (also called 'nodes and arcs
>>  diagrams')" and defines arc in its glossary as "A representation of a
>>  property in a graph form; specifically the edges in a directed labeled
>>  graph." The new Concepts and Syntax specs mention yet do not seem to
>>  define arc.
>-- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0419.html
>We do define node (link to editors' draft dfn):
>   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/WD-rdf-concepts-20030117/#dfn-node
>but not arc.  So can we talk about nodes & arcs pictures anymore? :)

Suggestion: we can talk about node and arc PICTURES. The pictures do 
have arcs in them. The graphs, however, don't.


IHMC					(850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973   home
40 South Alcaniz St.			(850)202 4416   office
Pensacola              			(850)202 4440   fax
FL 32501           				(850)291 0667    cell
phayes@ai.uwf.edu	          http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes
s.pam@ai.uwf.edu   for spam
Received on Friday, 6 June 2003 10:04:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:54:06 UTC