W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > June 2003

Re: Defining Arc?

From: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2003 09:04:23 -0500
Message-Id: <p0521060ebb064fa21a56@[10.0.100.24]>
To: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org

>I am going through the editorial updates to the syntax WD and I got to:
>
>>  Does the RDF series need to define "arc"? The original RDF syntax says
>>  quite a lot: "directed labeled graphs (also called 'nodes and arcs
>>  diagrams')" and defines arc in its glossary as "A representation of a
>>  property in a graph form; specifically the edges in a directed labeled
>>  graph." The new Concepts and Syntax specs mention yet do not seem to
>>  define arc.
>-- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0419.html
>
>We do define node (link to editors' draft dfn):
>   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/WD-rdf-concepts-20030117/#dfn-node
>
>but not arc.  So can we talk about nodes & arcs pictures anymore? :)

Suggestion: we can talk about node and arc PICTURES. The pictures do 
have arcs in them. The graphs, however, don't.

Pat


-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC					(850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973   home
40 South Alcaniz St.			(850)202 4416   office
Pensacola              			(850)202 4440   fax
FL 32501           				(850)291 0667    cell
phayes@ai.uwf.edu	          http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes
s.pam@ai.uwf.edu   for spam
Received on Friday, 6 June 2003 10:04:27 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:57:54 EDT