W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > June 2003

Re: Defining Arc?

From: Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org>
Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2003 17:53:03 +0100
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20030605175132.0255fb38@127.0.0.1>
To: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>, RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>

I'm agnostic about defining 'Arc'.  But I do think the term 'node' is 
useful separately from the context of "nodes and arcs diagrams".

#g
--

At 12:47 05/06/03 +0100, Dave Beckett wrote:

>I am going through the editorial updates to the syntax WD and I got to:
>
> > Does the RDF series need to define "arc"? The original RDF syntax says
> > quite a lot: "directed labeled graphs (also called 'nodes and arcs
> > diagrams')" and defines arc in its glossary as "A representation of a
> > property in a graph form; specifically the edges in a directed labeled
> > graph." The new Concepts and Syntax specs mention yet do not seem to
> > define arc.
>-- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0419.html
>
>We do define node (link to editors' draft dfn):
>   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/WD-rdf-concepts-20030117/#dfn-node
>
>but not arc.  So can we talk about nodes & arcs pictures anymore? :)
>
>Dave

-------------------
Graham Klyne
<GK@NineByNine.org>
PGP: 0FAA 69FF C083 000B A2E9  A131 01B9 1C7A DBCA CB5E
Received on Thursday, 5 June 2003 13:32:36 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:57:54 EDT