On Tue, 2003-07-29 at 00:08, pat hayes wrote: > Regarding the below, my current version says this: > > "... there may be valid D-entailments for > particular datatypes which depend on > idiosyncratic properties of the particular > datatypes, such as..." (old text at end of > section 7.4, now following added:) > > "In particular, the value space and > lexical-to-value mapping of the XSD datatype > xsd:string sanctions the identification of typed > literals with plain literals without language > tags for all character strings which are in the > lexical space of the datatype, since both of them > denote the Unicode character string which is > displayed in the literal; so the following > inference rule is valid in all > XSD-interpretations. Here, 'sss' indicates any > string of characters in the lexical space of > xsd:string. That last sentence is particularly cunning. Too cunning? Should we note that some plain literals are not in the lex space of xsd:string? BrianReceived on Tuesday, 29 July 2003 07:15:03 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:58:51 EDT