W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > July 2003

Re: Request for clarification on Canonical XML

From: Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 00:57:26 -0400 (EDT)
To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
cc: John Boyer <JBoyer@PureEdge.com>, Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>, "w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org" <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>, "w3c-i18n-ig@w3.org" <w3c-i18n-ig@w3.org>, "w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org" <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>, "Peter F. \\\\ Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0307250055330.31437-100000@smtp.datapower.com>

> In particular the problem
> of namespaces that are used but not so visibly so, seems to be a reasonable
> argument for using c14n rather than exc-c14n).

Not sure what this could mean - you mean something
like a qname attribute value?  Oh.  I suppose you
could work around that by adding the prefix to the
inclusives list, but I see your point.
	/r$

--
Rich Salz                  Chief Security Architect
DataPower Technology       http://www.datapower.com
XS40 XML Security Gateway  http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html
XML Security Overview      http://www.datapower.com/xmldev/xmlsecurity.html
Received on Friday, 25 July 2003 00:57:33 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:58:48 EDT