W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > July 2003

RE: RDF Concepts editors draft updated

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 17:10:34 +0200
To: "Graham Klyne" <gk@ninebynine.org>, <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <BHEGLCKMOHGLGNOKPGHDAEOACBAA.jjc@hpl.hp.com>


Thanks for catching that.
Will update in a few hours.

Jeremy

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Graham Klyne [mailto:gk@ninebynine.org]
> Sent: 22 July 2003 17:01
> To: Jeremy Carroll; w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
> Subject: Re: RDF Concepts editors draft updated
>
>
> Jeremy,
>
> This doesn't cover the full extent of the WG agreement:
>
> [[
> Vocabulary terms in the rdf:  namespace are listed in  section 5.1 of the
> RDF syntax specification [RDF-SYNTAX]. Some of these terms are defined by
> the RDF specifications to denote specific concepts. Others have syntactic
> purpose (e.g. rdf:ID is part of the RDF/XML syntax) and should
> not be used
> in RDF to denote any kind of resource.
> ]]
>
> should be
>
> [[
> Vocabulary terms in the rdf:  namespace are listed in  section 5.1 of the
> RDF syntax specification [RDF-SYNTAX]. Some of these terms are defined by
> the RDF specifications to denote specific concepts. Others have syntactic
> purpose (e.g. rdf:ID is part of the RDF/XML syntax).
> ]]
>
> i.e. delete the final part of the last sentence.
>
> I've just realized this didn't make it to the minutes of that
> telecon [1],
> though the revised wording was recorded in the IRC [2].
>
> #g
> --
>
> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Jul/0173.html
>
> [2] http://ilrt.org/discovery/chatlogs/rdfcore/2003-07-11#T15-05-53
> and agreed:
>      http://ilrt.org/discovery/chatlogs/rdfcore/2003-07-11#T15-07-55
>
>
> At 23:04 21/07/03 +0300, Jeremy Carroll wrote:
>
>
> >I have done these four actions, as per the telecon minutes:
> >
> >I18N interest:
> >JJC   add warning to Concepts 3.4 to use XML if markup required
> >
> >more boring:
> >JJC   apply pfps-22/23 changes as agreed last week
> >JJC   remove normative references to RDFS URI
> >JJC   remove references to term "RDF core" in Concepts
> >(mainly impacting section 4)
> >
> >
> >Editors draft URI:
> >http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/WD-rdf-concepts-20030117/
> >
> >
> >Graham, please review section 4, and if the overall text looks OK give
> >peter a
> >heads up to see if he is less unhappy.
> >
> >The text I have added to 3.4 is a normal paragraph at the end of
> the section
> >which reads:
> >[[
> >For natural language text that may require markup, the use of
> typed literals
> >with type rdf:XMLLiteral is suitable. In such cases, a language tag, if
> >required, must be explicitly included within the markup, usually
> as the value
> >of a xml:lang or lang attribute, possibly on a span or div element,
> >additional to the principal content [XHTML].
> >]]
> >
> >The informative reference to XHTML is new.
> >
> >Jeremy
>
> -------------------
> Graham Klyne
> <GK@NineByNine.org>
> PGP: 0FAA 69FF C083 000B A2E9  A131 01B9 1C7A DBCA CB5E
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 22 July 2003 11:32:10 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:58:46 EDT