Re: pfps-22,pfps-23: "reserved names in abstract syntax", pushback

On Tue, 2003-07-01 at 18:18, Jeremy Carroll wrote:
> 
> I would be happy to go forward with this as a listed objection.
> 
> I think Peter has adequately understood our intent, he sees some black, 
> some white and a grey area.
> 
> rdfs:Class rdfs:Class rdfs:Class .


We should be able to respond to Peter pointing to the text that answers
his question.  Can we do that?

Brian

Received on Sunday, 6 July 2003 10:49:15 UTC