RE: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2003-01-31

On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, Jeremy Carroll wrote:

>
>
> > www-rdf-comments
> >   o is for process - not general discussion
> >   o please let editors or the chairs handle comments process
> >   o please keep threads together - i.e. reply to messagage
> >
> > Any other process issues?
> >
> >
>
> I am hoping for still greater clarity at the telecon.
>
> In the example of danc-01, danc-02 - I think there is a discussion to be
> had, and I want WG involvement in that discussion - should I be having this
> discussion:
> - on w3c-rdfcore-wg
> - on www-rdf-comments
> - at the telecon
>
> or all three or what?
>
> Such discussion might result in substantive textual changes.

Yep. The occasions where I've cross-posted I've wanted to follow up to
the original sender, and open up discussion on rdfcore.

-- 
jan grant, ILRT, University of Bristol. http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/
Tel +44(0)117 9287088 Fax +44 (0)117 9287112 http://ioctl.org/jan/
perl -e 's?ck?t??print:perl==pants if $_="Just Another Perl Hacker\n"'