W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > January 2003

RE: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2003-01-31

From: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 10:38:22 +0000 (GMT)
To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
cc: bwm <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, w3c-rdfcore-wg <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.44.0301311037400.26607-100000@mail.ilrt.bris.ac.uk>

On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, Jeremy Carroll wrote:

>
>
> > www-rdf-comments
> >   o is for process - not general discussion
> >   o please let editors or the chairs handle comments process
> >   o please keep threads together - i.e. reply to messagage
> >
> > Any other process issues?
> >
> >
>
> I am hoping for still greater clarity at the telecon.
>
> In the example of danc-01, danc-02 - I think there is a discussion to be
> had, and I want WG involvement in that discussion - should I be having this
> discussion:
> - on w3c-rdfcore-wg
> - on www-rdf-comments
> - at the telecon
>
> or all three or what?
>
> Such discussion might result in substantive textual changes.

Yep. The occasions where I've cross-posted I've wanted to follow up to
the original sender, and open up discussion on rdfcore.

-- 
jan grant, ILRT, University of Bristol. http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/
Tel +44(0)117 9287088 Fax +44 (0)117 9287112 http://ioctl.org/jan/
perl -e 's?ck?t??print:perl==pants if $_="Just Another Perl Hacker\n"'
Received on Friday, 31 January 2003 05:39:12 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:55:24 EDT