> www-rdf-comments > o is for process - not general discussion > o please let editors or the chairs handle comments process > o please keep threads together - i.e. reply to messagage > > Any other process issues? > > I am hoping for still greater clarity at the telecon. In the example of danc-01, danc-02 - I think there is a discussion to be had, and I want WG involvement in that discussion - should I be having this discussion: - on w3c-rdfcore-wg - on www-rdf-comments - at the telecon or all three or what? Such discussion might result in substantive textual changes. JeremyReceived on Friday, 31 January 2003 04:29:57 EST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:55:24 EDT