On Tue, 2003-01-28 at 07:09, Jeremy Carroll wrote: > Brian > > would you please walk me through what I am meant to do. > > Dan has made a comment on my text, you have assigned a number to it: > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#danc-02 > and given it a name "goofy literals". Gee... I would hope this is a simple editorial tweak, not the sort of thing where the WG need be involved. Nobody has to change any test cases or code over this; it's just a matter of how the text is written. It's fine to be conservative about these things, but if it were me, this wouldn't warrant an issue. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/Received on Tuesday, 28 January 2003 09:55:40 EST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:55:24 EDT