W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > January 2003

RE: Formal Objections: [was Re: regrets for 2003-01-17]

From: <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 08:47:17 +0200
Message-ID: <A03E60B17132A84F9B4BB5EEDE57957B015D379B@trebe006.europe.nokia.com>
To: <connolly@w3.org>, <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: <me@aaronsw.com>, <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>

> Likewise, I'm sure Patrick stated his objections on
> behalf of Nokia, and I believe they're part of the WG
> proceedings, though I'm not sure which part could
> serve as a succinct statment of his position; perhaps
> he'd like to nominate or write something.



Though note that after a significant amount of internal discussion
and debate, we decided not to formally oppose the present
solution, and the chair was notified of that. Though there 
remains a strong degree of dissatisfaction in certain aspects of 
it (namely the tidy treatment of untyped literals resulting
in the need to recode large amounts of existing content and
the lack of a mechanism for implicit datatyping). 

Received on Monday, 20 January 2003 01:47:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:54:03 UTC