- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 11:19:29 +0000
- To: Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com, <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Looks like we could go as is and fix the wording in last call. However, if Graham and Patrick agree updated text, I can easily apply the change. Brian At 12:26 15/01/2003 +0200, Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com wrote: >Not a show stopper, but still a big nit... > > >ACTION 2003-01-10#8 (gk) supply words for concepts section 3.3 to > > address PatS' concerns that we stress DTing is not XSD-only. > > > >Old: > >[[ > >RDF uses the datatype abstraction defined by XML Schema Part 2: Datatypes > >[XML-SCHEMA2]. A datatype consists of a lexical space, a value space and a > >datatype mapping. > >]] > >New: > >[[ > >RDF uses the datatype abstraction defined by XML Schema Part 2: Datatypes > >[XML-SCHEMA2], and may be used with any datatype definition that follows > >this pattern. A datatype consists of a lexical space, a value space and a > >datatype mapping. > >]] > >This still IMO reads that "any XML Schema datatype" rather than "any >datatype that conforms to the definition of an rdfs:Datatype". > >Perhaps: > >[[ >RDF uses the datatype abstraction defined by XML Schema Part 2: Datatypes >[XML-SCHEMA2], and may be used with any datatype definition that follows >this model, even if not actually defined in terms of XML Schema. A datatype >consists of a lexical space, a value space and a datatype mapping. >]] > >??? > >Patrick
Received on Wednesday, 15 January 2003 06:18:09 UTC