I'm OK with Patrick's, modulo s/model/pattern/. (I think yet another use of "model" maybe unhelpful.) #g -- At 11:19 AM 1/15/03 +0000, Brian McBride wrote: >Looks like we could go as is and fix the wording in last call. However, >if Graham and Patrick agree updated text, I can easily apply the change. > >Brian > >At 12:26 15/01/2003 +0200, Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com wrote: > > >>Not a show stopper, but still a big nit... >> >> >ACTION 2003-01-10#8 (gk) supply words for concepts section 3.3 to >> > address PatS' concerns that we stress DTing is not XSD-only. >> > >> >Old: >> >[[ >> >RDF uses the datatype abstraction defined by XML Schema Part 2: Datatypes >> >[XML-SCHEMA2]. A datatype consists of a lexical space, a value space and a >> >datatype mapping. >> >]] >> >New: >> >[[ >> >RDF uses the datatype abstraction defined by XML Schema Part 2: Datatypes >> >[XML-SCHEMA2], and may be used with any datatype definition that follows >> >this pattern. A datatype consists of a lexical space, a value space and a >> >datatype mapping. >> >]] >> >>This still IMO reads that "any XML Schema datatype" rather than "any >>datatype that conforms to the definition of an rdfs:Datatype". >> >>Perhaps: >> >>[[ >>RDF uses the datatype abstraction defined by XML Schema Part 2: Datatypes >>[XML-SCHEMA2], and may be used with any datatype definition that follows >>this model, even if not actually defined in terms of XML Schema. A datatype >>consists of a lexical space, a value space and a datatype mapping. >>]] >> >>??? >> >>Patrick > >------------------- >Graham Klyne ><GK@NineByNine.org>Received on Wednesday, 15 January 2003 10:25:03 EST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:55:21 EDT