RE: Edits to concepts document, per 2003-01-10 telecon

I'm OK with Patrick's, modulo s/model/pattern/.   (I think yet another use 
of "model" maybe unhelpful.)

#g
--

At 11:19 AM 1/15/03 +0000, Brian McBride wrote:

>Looks like we could go as is and fix the wording in last call.  However, 
>if Graham and Patrick agree updated text, I can easily apply the change.
>
>Brian
>
>At 12:26 15/01/2003 +0200, Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com wrote:
>
>
>>Not a show stopper, but still a big nit...
>>
>> >ACTION 2003-01-10#8 (gk) supply words for concepts section 3.3 to
>> >         address PatS' concerns that we stress DTing is not XSD-only.
>> >
>> >Old:
>> >[[
>> >RDF uses the datatype abstraction defined by XML Schema Part 2: Datatypes
>> >[XML-SCHEMA2]. A datatype consists of a lexical space, a value space and a
>> >datatype mapping.
>> >]]
>> >New:
>> >[[
>> >RDF uses the datatype abstraction defined by XML Schema Part 2: Datatypes
>> >[XML-SCHEMA2], and may be used with any datatype definition that follows
>> >this pattern.  A datatype consists of a lexical space, a value space and a
>> >datatype mapping.
>> >]]
>>
>>This still IMO reads that "any XML Schema datatype" rather than "any
>>datatype that conforms to the definition of an rdfs:Datatype".
>>
>>Perhaps:
>>
>>[[
>>RDF uses the datatype abstraction defined by XML Schema Part 2: Datatypes
>>[XML-SCHEMA2], and may be used with any datatype definition that follows
>>this model, even if not actually defined in terms of XML Schema. A datatype
>>consists of a lexical space, a value space and a datatype mapping.
>>]]
>>
>>???
>>
>>Patrick
>
>-------------------
>Graham Klyne
><GK@NineByNine.org>

Received on Wednesday, 15 January 2003 10:25:03 UTC