W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > August 2003

Re: xmlsch-02

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 12:03:16 +0100
Message-ID: <3F4F32F4.5020904@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
To: Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
Cc: gk@ninebynine.org, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org, pfps@research.bell-labs.com

Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com wrote:


> But I think it's clear that neither " 10 " or "10.0" are 
> valid lexical forms for xsd:integer and their occurrence
> in a typed literal would be an error.

That was Peter's point.  These can be part of a syntically correct RDF 
graph and the semantics doc allows them to have a meaning, so in his 
view, they are not an error.

At this point I should give up speaking for him.

Received on Friday, 29 August 2003 07:06:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:54:07 UTC