On Mon, 18 Aug 2003, Dan Connolly wrote: > > > Are you waiting on a particular answer from the RDFCore group to > > > repond? The XML Schema group? A particular individual? > > > > Hopefully for Pat to just confirm that I didn't imagine it when I > > thought I heard him say that this is now the treatment of XSD types: ie, > > that their denotation is a pair of (typename, value). > > I'm pretty sure Pat has gotten the wrong impression about how > XSD types work. Please don't base RDF Core tests on his > say alone... or mine, for that matter. Please find text > of published XSD specs for whatever we believe about XSD. Roger that, I'll have another look myself tomorrow. I _hope_ this is simply a misunderstanding of my own, but I want to make sure. -- jan grant, ILRT, University of Bristol. http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/ Tel +44(0)117 9287088 Fax +44 (0)117 9287112 http://ioctl.org/jan/ YKYBPTMRogueW... you try to move diagonally in vi.Received on Monday, 18 August 2003 16:58:09 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:59:40 EDT