- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 15:54:17 -0500
- To: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
- Cc: Eric Miller <em@w3.org>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
On Mon, 2003-08-18 at 15:45, Jan Grant wrote: > On Mon, 18 Aug 2003, Eric Miller wrote: > > > > I'm waiting on one thing. As I understand it, the value spaces of > > > xsd:integer and xsd:decimal no longer intersect. If that is correct > > > then > > > one datatype test case needs changing, since it currently suggests > > > otherwise. > > > > > > The test case is > > > http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/datatypes/ > > > Manifest.rdf#semantic-equivalence-between-datatypes > > > > > > which says that > > > > > > [[ > > > eg:foo eg:bar "10"^^<xsd:integer> . > > > ]] > > > rdfs+dt(xsd:integer, xsd:decimal)-entails > > > [[ > > > eg:foo eg:bar "10.0"^^<xsd:decimal> . > > > ]] > > > > > > I'm waiting on a confirmation that this is, or is not, actually the > > > case, in light of recent xsd clarifications. > > > > Are you waiting on a particular answer from the RDFCore group to > > repond? The XML Schema group? A particular individual? > > Hopefully for Pat to just confirm that I didn't imagine it when I > thought I heard him say that this is now the treatment of XSD types: ie, > that their denotation is a pair of (typename, value). I'm pretty sure Pat has gotten the wrong impression about how XSD types work. Please don't base RDF Core tests on his say alone... or mine, for that matter. Please find text of published XSD specs for whatever we believe about XSD. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Monday, 18 August 2003 16:54:19 UTC