W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > August 2003

Re: document status update

From: Eric Miller <em@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 14:28:15 -0400
Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
To: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
Message-Id: <BB635166-D1A9-11D7-9608-000A9582FD3A@w3.org>


On Monday, August 18, 2003, at 01:39  PM, Jan Grant wrote:

> On Mon, 18 Aug 2003, Eric Miller wrote:
>
>>
>>  From last Friday's RDF Core call, today looks like a target date.
>>
>> [[
>> Item: Document Status
>> Primer DONE.
>> Concepts: a couple of things arising today; can be ready Monday
>> Syntax: as above.
>> Semantics: as above.
>> Schema: Reification action for today will be done Monday.
>> Test cases: TC repo awaiting checking, actions from today, can be  
>> ready
>> Monday
>> ]]
>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Aug/0215.html
>>
>> Primer  and Syntax [1] seem to be done. Can i get a status update on
>> the rest of the docs?  I think it would be nice to have a little
>> something for Brian when he returns :)
>
> I'm waiting on one thing. As I understand it, the value spaces of
> xsd:integer and xsd:decimal no longer intersect. If that is correct  
> then
> one datatype test case needs changing, since it currently suggests
> otherwise.
>
> The test case is
> http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/datatypes/ 
> Manifest.rdf#semantic-equivalence-between-datatypes
>
> which says that
>
> [[
> 	eg:foo eg:bar "10"^^<xsd:integer> .
> ]]
>  rdfs+dt(xsd:integer, xsd:decimal)-entails
> [[
> 	eg:foo eg:bar "10.0"^^<xsd:decimal> .
> ]]
>
> I'm waiting on a confirmation that this is, or is not, actually the
> case, in light of recent xsd clarifications.

Are you waiting on a particular answer from the RDFCore group to  
repond? The XML Schema group? A particular individual?

--eric
Received on Monday, 18 August 2003 14:28:14 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:59:40 EDT