- From: Emmanuel Pietriga <emmanuel@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 14:51:03 -0400
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>, Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>, ext Frank Manola <fmanola@mitre.org>, w3c-rdfcore-wg <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Done. The RDF Validator now uses Jena 2beta1. Emmanuel -- Emmanuel Pietriga (emmanuel@w3.org) | MIT - CSAIL World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) | Room NE43-344 tel: +1 617.253.5327 | 200 Technology Square fax: +1 617.258.5999 | Cambridge, MA 02139 http://www.w3.org/People/Emmanuel/ Jeremy Carroll wrote: >I suspect Emmanuel just needs to slot in the latest Jena release ... >(I understand the validator is now using the version 2 stream which is up to >date on all WG decisions) > >Jeremy > > > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: w3c-rdfcore-wg-request@w3.org >>[mailto:w3c-rdfcore-wg-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Dave Beckett >>Sent: 11 August 2003 10:17 >>To: Patrick Stickler >>Cc: ext Frank Manola; w3c-rdfcore-wg >>Subject: Re: W3C RDF Validator vs. tbl-03 >> >> >> >> >> >>On Mon, 11 Aug 2003, Patrick Stickler wrote: >> >> >>>I recall the decision was "doesn't have to generate" not >>>"should not generate". >>> >>>So technically, the validator is conformant. Though someone >>>may still wish to change it to omit the triples in question. >>> >>> >>There is no fuzziness at all in what triples are generated >>from RDF/XML - that is one of the things we were revising for. >>parseType="Collection" must not generate them after our change. >> >>Applications that don't want to be conformant can do what they >>like, as always. >> >>Dave >> >> >> >> > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 13 August 2003 14:50:43 UTC