W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > August 2003

Re: W3C RDF Validator vs. tbl-03

From: Emmanuel Pietriga <emmanuel@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 14:51:03 -0400
Message-ID: <3F3A8897.50107@w3.org>
To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>, Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>, ext Frank Manola <fmanola@mitre.org>, w3c-rdfcore-wg <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>

Done. The RDF Validator now uses Jena 2beta1.

Emmanuel

-- 
Emmanuel Pietriga (emmanuel@w3.org) |  MIT - CSAIL
World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)     |  Room NE43-344
tel: +1 617.253.5327                |  200 Technology Square
fax: +1 617.258.5999                |  Cambridge, MA 02139
http://www.w3.org/People/Emmanuel/



Jeremy Carroll wrote:

>I suspect Emmanuel just needs to slot in the latest Jena release ...
>(I understand the validator is now using the version 2 stream which is up to
>date on all WG decisions)
>
>Jeremy
>
>  
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: w3c-rdfcore-wg-request@w3.org
>>[mailto:w3c-rdfcore-wg-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Dave Beckett
>>Sent: 11 August 2003 10:17
>>To: Patrick Stickler
>>Cc: ext Frank Manola; w3c-rdfcore-wg
>>Subject: Re: W3C RDF Validator vs. tbl-03
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>On Mon, 11 Aug 2003, Patrick Stickler wrote:
>>    
>>
>>>I recall the decision was "doesn't have to generate" not
>>>"should not generate".
>>>
>>>So technically, the validator is conformant. Though someone
>>>may still wish to change it to omit the triples in question.
>>>      
>>>
>>There is no fuzziness at all in what triples are generated
>>from RDF/XML - that is one of the things we were revising for.
>>parseType="Collection" must not generate them after our change.
>>
>>Applications that don't want to be conformant can do what they
>>like, as always.
>>
>>Dave
>>
>>
>>    
>>
>
>
>  
>
Received on Wednesday, 13 August 2003 14:50:43 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:59:37 EDT