RE: W3C RDF Validator vs. tbl-03

I suspect Emmanuel just needs to slot in the latest Jena release ...
(I understand the validator is now using the version 2 stream which is up to
date on all WG decisions)

Jeremy

> -----Original Message-----
> From: w3c-rdfcore-wg-request@w3.org
> [mailto:w3c-rdfcore-wg-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Dave Beckett
> Sent: 11 August 2003 10:17
> To: Patrick Stickler
> Cc: ext Frank Manola; w3c-rdfcore-wg
> Subject: Re: W3C RDF Validator vs. tbl-03
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, 11 Aug 2003, Patrick Stickler wrote:
> > I recall the decision was "doesn't have to generate" not
> > "should not generate".
> >
> > So technically, the validator is conformant. Though someone
> > may still wish to change it to omit the triples in question.
>
> There is no fuzziness at all in what triples are generated
> from RDF/XML - that is one of the things we were revising for.
> parseType="Collection" must not generate them after our change.
>
> Applications that don't want to be conformant can do what they
> like, as always.
>
> Dave
>
>