W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > August 2003

Re: W3C RDF Validator vs. tbl-03

From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 09:53:57 +0300
Message-ID: <006401c35fd5$b845a2b0$de0ca20a@NOE.Nokia.com>
To: "ext Frank Manola" <fmanola@mitre.org>, <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>

I recall the decision was "doesn't have to generate" not
"should not generate".

So technically, the validator is conformant. Though someone
may still wish to change it to omit the triples in question.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "ext Frank Manola" <fmanola@mitre.org>
To: <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Sent: 10 August, 2003 23:31
Subject: W3C RDF Validator vs. tbl-03

> I noticed when validating the parseType="Collection" example from the 
> Primer that the W3C RDF Validator still generates rdf:type rdf:List 
> triples for the blank nodes, which I believe we decided was no longer 
> supposed to happen in resolving issue tbl-03.  This should probably be 
> fixed at some point.  Either that or people will complain that the graph 
>   in the Primer (which I changed to take all that stuff out) doesn't 
> match the graph generated by the Validator.
> --Frank
> -- 
> Frank Manola                   The MITRE Corporation
> 202 Burlington Road, MS A345   Bedford, MA 01730-1420
> mailto:fmanola@mitre.org       voice: 781-271-8147   FAX: 781-271-875
Received on Monday, 11 August 2003 02:56:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:54:07 UTC