- From: Ralph R. Swick <swick@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2003 11:42:07 -0400
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org, mf@w3.org
At 10:48 AM 8/8/2003 -0400, Dan Brickley wrote: >* Ralph R. Swick <swick@w3.org> [2003-08-08 10:01-0400] >> I see this has only one language declaration: >> >> <owl:Ontology xml:lang="fr" rdf:about="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#" dc:title="Le vocabulaire de RDF et RDF Schema." /> > >Oops, I meant to put it on a top element that enclosed the others; >forgetting that Ontology was self-closing <Ontology/> ... >... >... it should have gone on the rdf:RDF. > >BTW I believe we're bypassing the current I18N debate since these >labels/comments are plain literals not XML literals... (is that correct) really?! I'm very surprised (but pleased) if this is indeed the WG's consensus than an xml:lang on the root rdf:RDF element is sufficient to cause the graph to contain (in some manner) the information that all the strings are in French.
Received on Friday, 8 August 2003 11:43:11 UTC