- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 08:47:50 -0400
- To: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
- Cc: ext Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, rdf core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
* Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com> [2003-08-06 15:40+0300] > Whatever solution we choose, it should provide enough information > to test equality of values. > > Option A does not do that. The argument that integers are thus > vaguely defined is bogus, in that integers are defined sufficiently > well to test for equality, among other things. Option A is quite > a bit more vague than the definition of integers. > > Option B seems the most promising. I'd like to hear > a summary of the concerns with this. I don't recall seeing anything > on the WG list. I just sent one: we would need to decide which version of XPath to reference, and understand any costs/risks re blessing XPath 1.0 when 2.0 is looming. Dan
Received on Wednesday, 6 August 2003 08:47:51 UTC