W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > August 2003

Re: Denotation of XMLLiterals: poll

From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 08:47:50 -0400
To: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
Cc: ext Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, rdf core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20030806124750.GL24187@w3.org>

* Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com> [2003-08-06 15:40+0300]
> Whatever solution we choose, it should provide enough information
> to test equality of values.
> Option A does not do that. The argument that integers are thus
> vaguely defined is bogus, in that integers are defined sufficiently
> well to test for equality, among other things. Option A is quite
> a bit more vague than the definition of integers.
> Option B seems the most promising. I'd like to hear
> a summary of the concerns with this. I don't recall seeing anything
> on the WG list.

I just sent one: we would need to decide which version of XPath to
reference, and understand any costs/risks re blessing XPath 1.0 when 2.0
is looming.

Received on Wednesday, 6 August 2003 08:47:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:54:07 UTC