W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > August 2003

Re: RDF in SVG section for RDF/XML syntax draft

From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2003 14:07:51 +0100
To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
Cc: RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <20030801140751.79d6d870.dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>

On Fri, 1 Aug 2003 13:42:50 +0200
Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org> wrote:

> On Friday, August 1, 2003, 1:12:04 PM, Dave wrote:
> 
> DB> This was asked for ages ago and I drafted it but didn't send it out publically.
> DB> It's in reply to a comment of Chris Lilley who asked why we didn't point
> DB> to SVG's use of RDF metadata.:
> 
> >>... I request (as an individual commentor) that you do
> >>explicitly discuss embedding of RDF within SVG in your document. A new
> >>section 10 "Using RDF/XML with SVG" would seem appropriate. I would be
> >>happy to help draft such a section.
> 
> Thanks for the positive reply. I see that
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Apr/0020.html
> suggested asking me to prepare such a section, but unfortunately did
> not copy me, so i was unaware of this discussion until today.

Yes, that was my fault - I lost the issue and forgot about the draft.  Sorry.

> May I assume from todays message that the intention is to add this
> section 10?

Yes, I've already had the RDF Core WG's goahead for this.

> DB> -- Chris Lilley, http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2003Mar/0075.html
> 
> DB> which Brian forwarded in April
> DB>   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Apr/0020.html
> 
> DB> There is always scope to expand the text below futher however my only
> DB> real issue is which SVG version(s) to mention.  Should I mention SVG 1.0
> DB> and 1.1 since both are recommendations?
> 
> Sure, point to 1.1 as well, it says the same as 1.0 does. 1.0 was
> where the facility was introduced. 1.1 merely modularises 1.0.

Will do.

> The draft text looks good and its inclusion would satisfy my requirements.

Great, thanks

Dave
Received on Friday, 1 August 2003 09:10:16 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:59:31 EDT