W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > April 2003

Re: Another Comment on Owl Ref {was: Re: Denotation of owl:Class)

From: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo@agfa.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2003 22:30:50 +0200
To: "Brian McBride <bwm" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org, w3c-rdfcore-wg-request@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF590F2E64.629C9F20-ONC1256D15.00702670-C1256D15.0070B1A9@agfa.be>

> Oh dear, I was hoping there was good reason for making the
> distinction.  Can someone confirm Jeremy's view.

all I know is that in OWL *full*

owl:Class owl:equivalentClass rdfs:Class.

i.e. they have the same ICEXT
(but are not owl:sameAs)

-- ,
Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
Received on Sunday, 27 April 2003 16:32:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:54:05 UTC