W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > April 2003

pfps-08 test cases

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 21:45:15 +0300
To: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <200304252145.15841.jjc@hpl.hp.com>


Pat

I was surprised to see in the IRC log your claim that Peter is happier with 
the treatment of XMLLiteral ...

I had a look at:
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/WD-rdf-mt-20030117

to try and work out what the document currently says.

As I see it, it says

a) langauge tags are irrelevant for all other datatypes

<eg:a> <eg:p> "foo"@en^^<eg:d> .

 entails

<eg:a> <eg:p> "foo"@fr^^<eg:d> .


b) language tags are not irrelevant for rdf:XMLLiteral i.e.

<eg:a> <eg:p> "foo"@en^^rdf:XMLLiteral .

does not entail

<eg:a> <eg:p> "foo"@fr^^rdf:XMLLiteral.


Hence I conclude that:


<eg:a> <eg:p> "foo"@en^^<eg:d> .
<eg:d> owl:sameAs rdf:XMLLiteral .
cannot entail in OWL
<eg:a> <eg:p> "foo"@en^^rdf:XMLLiteral .

which I took to be the heart of Peter's comment.

What gives?

Jeremy
Received on Friday, 25 April 2003 15:44:58 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:57:01 EDT