Pat I was surprised to see in the IRC log your claim that Peter is happier with the treatment of XMLLiteral ... I had a look at: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/WD-rdf-mt-20030117 to try and work out what the document currently says. As I see it, it says a) langauge tags are irrelevant for all other datatypes <eg:a> <eg:p> "foo"@en^^<eg:d> . entails <eg:a> <eg:p> "foo"@fr^^<eg:d> . b) language tags are not irrelevant for rdf:XMLLiteral i.e. <eg:a> <eg:p> "foo"@en^^rdf:XMLLiteral . does not entail <eg:a> <eg:p> "foo"@fr^^rdf:XMLLiteral. Hence I conclude that: <eg:a> <eg:p> "foo"@en^^<eg:d> . <eg:d> owl:sameAs rdf:XMLLiteral . cannot entail in OWL <eg:a> <eg:p> "foo"@en^^rdf:XMLLiteral . which I took to be the heart of Peter's comment. What gives? JeremyReceived on Friday, 25 April 2003 15:44:58 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:57:01 EDT