Re: Issue timbl-03 "collection clutter" proposal to close

>>>Jeremy Carroll said:
> I am interested in Peter's view; if we made this change Peter would have to 
> do some work - if he were largely positive, I would change my position from 
> favouring a reject to favouring an accept.
> (cc-ing Peter on this message)
> [The proposal is that RDF/XML parsers should not emit triples
> _:x rdf:type rdf:List .
> since they are redundant).

My primary reason for justifying keeping these triples is that OWL
seems to use them - they are useful.  Given an equal choice, no
change is easier for us (RDF Core, WebOnt) to handle.

Dave

Received on Thursday, 24 April 2003 07:27:07 UTC