Re: Issue timbl-03 "collection clutter" proposal to close

>>>"Patrick.Stickler" said:
> My memory may be failing me, but didn't we already decide to
> accept this comment and not require generation of the impliable
> triple?

That was probably bagID.

I was taking
  http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#timbl-03
as definitive on what we decided.

Dave

Received on Thursday, 24 April 2003 07:24:17 UTC