> I like "datatype naming scheme" myself. It certainly makes it clear > that URIrefs are (here) being used as names for datatypes. Well, yes, but is this really a "naming scheme" specific to datatypes? Seems like it's just the generic URI to resource denotation/mapping and the only thing relating to datatyping is that the resources in question happen to all be datatypes. I wouldn't want to see a term that could easily be misunderstood to indicate something other than that basic, generic URI to resource mapping. PatrickReceived on Tuesday, 22 April 2003 01:49:20 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:56:57 EDT