W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > April 2003

Re: williams-01, proposal to close (revised)

From: Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>
Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2003 16:29:16 +0100
Message-Id: <>
To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org

"representation of statements" here seems fine to me, and somewhat easier 
to read.  I don't understand the problem.


At 09:08 09/04/2003 +0300, Jeremy Carroll wrote:

>Concerning section 3.2
>I think these changes would be better logged as miscellaneous editorial.
>They are quite minor.
>As always I dislike your decision to use UK case conventions on headings
>rather than US ones. Not that I am pro-american, simply for consistency with
>W3C house style.
>(This is more positive than I was last night about this section).
>You missed one change required by williams-01
>[[ Note that such blank node identifiers are not part
>of the RDF abstract syntax, and the representation of statements containing
>blank nodes is entirely dependent on the particular concrete syntax used.
>'statements' is incorrect. suggest
>"representation of statements" => "concrete representation of triples"

Graham Klyne
PGP: 0FAA 69FF C083 000B A2E9  A131 01B9 1C7A DBCA CB5E
Received on Wednesday, 9 April 2003 13:02:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:54:05 UTC