W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > April 2003

Re: tex-01 new proposal

From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2003 10:11:17 +0100
To: "Patrick.Stickler" <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>
cc: jjc <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, bwm <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, w3c-rdfcore-wg <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <9369.1049447477@hoth.ilrt.bris.ac.uk>

>>>"Patrick.Stickler" said:
> 
> 
> Just to check that I've understood this correctly:
> 
> > tex01/test002.rdf
> > <rdf:RDF>
> >  <rdf:Description xml:lang="en-US" eg:p="foo"/>
> >  <rdf:Description xml:lang="en-us" eg:p="foo"/>
> > </rdf:RDF>
> 
> results in 
> 
> > tex01/test002.nt
> > _:a eg:p "foo"@en-US .
> 
> i.e., "en-us" -> "en-US" during parsing
> 
> Right?

no.

Those are not parser (rdf/xml -> rdf graph) tests - they are model
comparing tests.  No parser will implement them and they must not be
added to the test cases as parser test cases.

I already asked the WG to stick with canonicalizing the lang tags
values to 1 form.  I don't care what it is, as long as it is one way.
Anything else makes simple RDF applications harder.

Dave
Received on Friday, 4 April 2003 04:14:11 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:56:51 EDT