At 11:29 27/09/2002 +0300, Patrick Stickler wrote: [...] >I hope so, if you now understand why the non-mnemonic test with >no range assertions is insufficient to clarify a tidy versus >untidy MT. I don't think so. I don't know what a "non-mnemonic" test is, but I do understand that the test you are using is a test for something other than the definition of tidyness the WG has been using, since it can produce different results. BrianReceived on Saturday, 28 September 2002 10:55:55 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:51:05 EDT