W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > September 2002

Re: monotonicity [was: Re: On Consensus]

From: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 11:44:54 +0200
To: "Brian McBride <bwm" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org, w3c-rdfcore-wg-request@w3.org
Message-ID: <OFCF8717E5.D99DB7F1-ONC1256C3F.003544F2-C1256C3F.00358CEA@agfa.be>


[...]

> 3) I think we demonstrated before that nonmon can be avoided with tidy
> semantics if we introduce another property.  Now before I get jumped on
> from a great height, I think we have accepted that the user community
don't
> want to introduce multiple properties into their schemas.  I'm not
> suggesting that.
>
> But, when an application gets the bitsPerPixel property value as a string

> and converts it to an integer, we could think of that as creating a new
> property with a new value:
>
>     _:s <bitsPerPixelAsInteger> xsd:int"8" .
>
> I think that would be monotonic.

I think so too, and I really like your
reasoning, go on and we find it

-- ,
Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
Received on Wednesday, 25 September 2002 05:46:15 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:51:03 EDT