W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > September 2002

Re: Tidy vs untidy literals: 2 test cases motivated by CC/PP

From: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 11:36:21 +0200
To: "Graham Klyne <GK" <GK@NineByNine.org>
Cc: RDF core WG <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>, w3c-rdfcore-wg-request@w3.org
Message-ID: <OFEF38DA4F.DA4C76F9-ONC1256C3F.0034759E-C1256C3F.0034C425@agfa.be>



> I suppose that if we were starting from scratch, I would design CC/PP
> differently using bNodes or typed literals throughout for data values,
thus
> sidestepping the problems of untyped literals.

right, I fully agree with that Graham
that is good unambiguous design/target

-- ,
Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/

Received on Wednesday, 25 September 2002 05:37:00 EDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Jos De_Roo: "Re: monotonicity [was: Re: On Consensus]"
Previous message: Graham Klyne: "Re: Minutes: 2002-09-20, ACTION 2002-09-20#2 ("assertion")"
Maybe in reply to: Graham Klyne: "Tidy vs untidy literals: 2 test cases motivated by CC/PP"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:51:03 EDT