W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > September 2002

should be 2002-09-06 [was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-08-30]

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2002 14:36:55 +0100
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20020906143426.00b0bfb0@0-mail-1.hpl.hp.com>
To: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org

At 18:21 05/09/2002 +0100, bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com wrote:

>Time:
>10:00:00 Fri Sep 06 2002 in America/New York
>
>which is equivalent to
>15:00:00 Fri Sep 06 2002 in Europe/London
>
>Phone: +1-617-761-6200 (Zakim)#7332
>irc: irc.w3.org #rdfcore
>
>1: Scribes
>This weeks volunteer scribe is Jan Grant
>Volunteer to scribe next week
>
>
>2: Roll Call
>
>
>3: Review Agenda
>
>
>4: Next telecon 13th Sept 2002
>
>
>5: Minutes of 2002-08-30 telecon with correction
>
>See:
>   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Sep/0008.html
>
>
>6: Confirm Status of Completed Actions
>
>ACTION: 2002-08-16#3 EricM
>publish rdf concepts and abstract data model WD
>
>see:
>   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Aug/0067.html
>
>see:
>   http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-concepts/
>
>ACTION: 2002-08-23#2 DaveB
>initiate dialog with DC community about the issue of rdf:Alt usage.
>
>ACTION: 2002-08-23#3 JanG
>review current datatypes document.
>
>see:
>   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Aug/0265.html
>
>ACTION: 2002-08-23#4 SteveP
>review current datatypes document.
>
>see:
>   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Aug/0265.html
>
>ACTION: 2002-08-30#3 Jan
>Write a proposal to change the form of literals.
>
>see:
>   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Sep/0021.html
>
>
>
>7: Confirm Status of Withdrawn Actions
>
>ACTION: 2002-08-30#2 Brian
>Add an issue of the attribute used to identify datatype literals
>
>ACTION: 2002-08-30#4 Brian
>Try to enter the conversation on dc-architecture.
>
>
>
>8: Status of new mime types draft
>2002-08-30#1  AaronSw  Publish new MIME Type Internet Draft
>
>
>See:
>   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Aug/0221.html
>
>
>9: Review of namespaces last call
>Volunteers to review this doc on behalf of the WG.
>
>
>See:
>   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Sep/0058.html
>
>
>10: Datatypes
>
>Discuss part 1 of Patrick's consensus building document
>
>   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Aug/0257.html
>
>along with changes proposed in
>
>   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Sep/0040.html
>
>Some folks have expressed enthusiasm that this document broadly captures
>a consensus on which the WG can move forward.  The chair would like to hear
>this also from the rest of the WG.
>
>Consider whether, in the light of this new approach to datatypes the contents
>of part 1 should be distributed amongst the other docs.
>
>Time permitting (perhaps after hours)
>
>The abstract syntax of literals.
>
>
>
>See:
>   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Aug/0233.html
>   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Aug/0257.html
>   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Sep/0040.html
>   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Sep/0061.html
>
>
>11: Relationship between XML Schema and RDF
>Specifically, suggestion to ignore attributes from the xml:schema
>namespace to allow processing by both xml schema processors and rdf
>processors.
>
>
>See:
>   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Aug/0165.html
>
>
>12: Frank's new assertion text
>2002-08-23#7  FrankM  Propose alternative text for the concepts and abstract
>                  model document to rectify concerns with conflicting use of
>                  "assertion".
>
>
>See:
>   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Aug/0226.html
> 
>http://www.ninebynine.org/wip/RDF-basics/2002-08-05/Overview.htm#section-Social
>
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------
>This agenda was produced by Jema, the Jena WG assistant
Received on Friday, 6 September 2002 09:39:08 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:50:57 EDT