W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > November 2002

Re: freenet URIs and URI ownership

From: Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 11:19:38 +0000
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20021125111717.04260ec0@127.0.0.1>
To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org

At 03:41 PM 11/21/02 +0100, Jeremy Carroll wrote:


>Anyone understand freenet?
>
>As far as I understand freenet URIs have an owner, who often wishes to
>remain anonymous. (Hence the use of freenet).
>
>Thus, putting too much weight on URIs having an authoritative owner may put
>RDF on the side of centralist big corporate against the more anarchic p2p
>freedom loving hackers.
>
>As far as I can see, freenet URIs could be made to work within the framework
>of authoritative statements, since essentially a freenet URI is a URL and so
>the authoritative statement of what a freenet URI means is the content that
>can be retrieved from that URL, if any.

This is reminiscent of something TimBL said in rebuttal of a comment I 
made... that naming authority really should be backed up by some definitive 
retrieval mechanism, preferably online.  I guess that freenet provides that 
in this case, and that is the only way to find the authority's intent.

#g


-------------------
Graham Klyne
<GK@NineByNine.org>
Received on Monday, 25 November 2002 09:35:50 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:54:09 EDT