- From: Frank Manola <fmanola@attbi.com>
- Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2002 18:10:47 -0500
- To: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
- CC: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Pat-- This has nothing to do with the question you raised, and perhaps I'm out of synch here (my head's been been in the Primer an awful lot), but I'm reading the Schema spec right now, and there isn't any such thing as "rdfs:name". Did we change "rdfs:label" to "rdfs:name" or what? --Frank pat hayes wrote: > Anyone on the WG, do y'all agree with Peter at @@@ below?? If someone > says yes and nobody objects, I will put these entailments into the MT. > You have until the end of Monday. snip >> >> rdfs:name rdf:type rdf:Property . * >> rdfs:name rdfs:domain rdfs:Resource . * >> rdfs:name rdfs:range rdfs:Literal . * @@@ >>
Received on Friday, 8 November 2002 17:54:38 UTC