Re: A datatype entailment - this should be a testcase?

Patrick Stickler wrote:

> Yes, I agree that the entailment holds.
> No, I don't think it is very useful as a test case.
> 


It shows a non-trivial interaction between the definition of the datatype 
and entailment. This is crucially different from other entailments that we 
have approved for out test cases.

Jeremy


>># eg:foo rdfs:range xsd:boolean .
>># range not needed for entailment.
>><a:a> eg:foo "true"^^xsd:boolean .
>><a:a> eg:foo "false"^^xsd:boolean .
>><a:uri> rdf:type xsd:boolean .
>>
>>entails
>>
>><a:a> eg:foo <a:uri> .
>>
>>
>>Description:
>>
>>We don't know which value <a:uri> has, but since it belongs to a finite
>>class, and both members of that class are in the eg:foo relationship to
>><a:a>, then <a:uri> must be.
>>