Re: A datatype entailment - this should be a testcase? from Brian McBride on 2002-11-04 (w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org from November 2002)

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2002 17:19:17 +0000
To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20021104171837.02fa0e18@0-mail-1.hpl.hp.com>

At 08:12 04/11/2002 +0000, Jeremy Carroll wrote:

>It shows a non-trivial interaction between the definition of the datatype 
>and entailment. This is crucially different from other entailments that we 
>have approved for out test cases.

Crucially different is one thing.  Crucially necessary is another.  Why is 
this needed?

Brian

Received on Monday, 4 November 2002 12:16:43 UTC