W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > November 2002

Re: A datatype entailment - this should be a testcase?

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2002 17:19:17 +0000
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20021104171837.02fa0e18@0-mail-1.hpl.hp.com>
To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org


At 08:12 04/11/2002 +0000, Jeremy Carroll wrote:

>It shows a non-trivial interaction between the definition of the datatype 
>and entailment. This is crucially different from other entailments that we 
>have approved for out test cases.

Crucially different is one thing.  Crucially necessary is another.  Why is 
this needed?

Brian

Received on Monday, 4 November 2002 12:16:43 EST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Brian McBride: "Re: on RDF concepts: thumbs up, contingent on a few things"
Previous message: Brian McBride: "Re: comments on primer so far"
In reply to: Jeremy Carroll: "Re: A datatype entailment - this should be a testcase?"
Next in thread: Jos De_Roo: "Re: A datatype entailment - this should be a testcase?"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:53:57 EDT