W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > May 2002

Re: Dublin Core, the Primer and the Model Theory

From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 10:26:51 -0400
To: ext Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@mimesweeper.com>, Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
CC: RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <B90939EB.14E99%patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
On 2002-05-16 7:09, "ext Graham Klyne" <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com> wrote:

> At 10:32 AM 5/16/02 +0100, Jeremy Carroll wrote:
>> I believe that the sheer quantity of these examples in the
>> primer indicates that this a substantial issue: that RDF, as
>> deployed, particularly in Dublin Core, does not conform with
>> the model theoretic changes agreed on the 22nd of February [2].
> 
> With emphasis on "sheer quantity", I think this is a compelling argument,
> which is not limited to Dublin Core.  (Though I do think that "does not
> conform" is a slight overstatement, I do think this indicates a real problem.)
> 
> Similar issues arise in at least two other RDF vocabularies that I can think
> of
> - CC/PP device capabilities and user preferences:
> http://www.w3.org/TR/CCPP-struct-vocab/
> - Photo labelling schema: http://www.w3.org/TR/photo-rdf/ (in particular,
> section 5.2)

Would you say that simpledatatypes2 accurately describes the
present semantics employed by CC/PP?

Patrick

--
               
Patrick Stickler              Phone: +358 50 483 9453
Senior Research Scientist     Fax:   +358 7180 35409
Nokia Research Center         Email: patrick.stickler@nokia.com
Received on Thursday, 16 May 2002 10:23:20 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:48:14 EDT