W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > March 2002

Re: review comments on rdf-syntax-grammar (version of 25 Mar)

From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2002 19:01:14 +0000
To: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
cc: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>, w3c-rdfcore-wg <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <15220.1016996474@tatooine.ilrt.bris.ac.uk> 
>>>Graham Klyne said:
> At 07:11 AM 3/24/02 -0500, Dan Brickley wrote:
> >I've been thinking about strategies for dealing with 'unserializable'
> >graphs. These are (AFAIK) all (or nearly all?? would be good to be clear)
> >to do with having the edges in some RDF graph be labelled with a URIref
> >that doesn't split conveniently into  namespace name and local name.
> 
> Other such graphs are literals in subject position, 

Not allowed at present in the model^Wgraph.

> ...and two different 
> properties with different subjects having the same blank node as 
> object.  Ther may be more.

Yes.

Jeremy goes through this in more detail in:

  Unparsing RDF/XML by Jeremy Carroll,
    HP Labs Technical Report, HPL-2001-294, 2001
    http://www.hpl.hp.com/techreports/2001/HPL-2001-294.html.

Dave
Received on Sunday, 24 March 2002 14:01:16 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:46:21 EDT