W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > March 2002

RE: Unasserted triples, Contexts and things that go bump in the night.

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: 21 Mar 2002 09:46:52 -0600
To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, Pat Hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <1016725613.26063.88.camel@dirk>
On Thu, 2002-03-21 at 07:42, Brian McBride wrote:
> At 22:28 20/03/2002 -0600, Dan Connolly wrote:
> [...]
> >Oh... but more substantively:
> >the hassle of dealing with an infinite number
> >of rdf:_1 rdf:_2 things.
> Hmmm.  Its been proposed we make all those subproperties of some common 
> super property, e.g. rdf:member.  Is there anything we are likely  to want 
> to say about any rdf:_nnn that is not true of rdfs:member.

Yes: rdf:_n are UniqueProperty's. Or at least: daml:first is.

>  Would that deal 
> with this, or am I missing the point?

You're on the right track, but until you actually
get to first/rest (or something equivalent) I don't
think you'll completely address the issue.

Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Thursday, 21 March 2002 10:47:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:53:56 UTC