W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > March 2002

RE: schedule to last call?

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 12:25:23 -0000
To: "Brian McBride" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, "RDF Core" <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <JAEBJCLMIFLKLOJGMELDGEHACDAA.jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>

Brian:
> its a "do
> we think we can do this"?
(frankly no)

At somepoint DanC pointed out that it is good manners to have a first call
prior to last call.

I am concerned that we are not leaving the possibility for the community to
review the datatyping proposal.

In this schedule the first MT with datatyping *is* the last call.
The gap for commuity feedback on schema (with or without datatyping) before
the last call WD is available is (less than) a week.

As is, as far as I know, we don't have a finished datatyping proposal to
write up into the WDs.

On the other hand, last call is not a rec, and we should get community
feedback at that point ...


> all:     Are there any holidays or other outages that will affect
> the schedule?

There is a webont f2f on 8th/9th April.

>
> editors: Do you commit to achieving this schedule?
>
> all:     Do we commit to the necessary detailed reviews for a last call
> publication as per this schedule?  I'd like to identify specific
> reviewers
> for each document.

I am happy to review:
  Syntax
  Model Theory
  Test Cases (I will at least identify the syntactic test cases that ARP
fails, and try and verify them manually).

If there really are two weeks (Apr 12 - 26) to do it in then I probably can
find the time.


>
> all:     What other groups should we approach for last call comments?  I
> have, webont, xml schema, i18n, canonicalization,
> DC,  PRISM, CC/PP as possibles but request advice.

(I would suggest highlighting only the relevant section to c14n - they are
not RDF literate).


Jeremy
Received on Wednesday, 20 March 2002 07:26:17 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:46:19 EDT