W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > March 2002

Re: RDF Test Cases updates

From: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 15:25:44 +0100
To: "Dave Beckett <dave.beckett" <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
Cc: "RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg" <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <OFC19217F8.92B92642-ONC1256B76.0048F387@agfa.be>


> Furthermore I've looked at these
>   nested-bagIDs: OK
>     However tests007 onwards are very complex and I need to study them

indeed, we need more hours...
anyhow, that is what I found

test001 test002 test003 test004 test005 ok (I now better understand the
decision about the nesting)

C:\www.w3.org\2000\10\rdf-tests\rdfcore\rdfms-nested-bagIDs>java -cp /Je
na-1.3.0/lib/jena.jar;/Jena-1.3.0/lib/xerces.jar -DproxySet=true -Dproxy
Host=vam1134.roam.agfa.be -DproxyPort=80 jena.rdfcompare http://www.w3.o
rg/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-nested-bagIDs/test005.rdf http://www.
rdf http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-nested-bagIDs/test
models are equal

test006 ok (however not for Jena)

test007 ok (however Jena-1.3.0 returns only triples 1 and 8
        cwm.py,v 1.87 only triple 8 and SiRPAC-1.17 returns all triples)

test008 ok

test009 ok

test010 ok (however Jena compare is not happy with 10b)

test011 ok (but Jena is not happy with both 11a and 11b)

test012 ok (this time Jena is not happy with 12a)

Received on Friday, 8 March 2002 09:26:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:53:56 UTC