W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > July 2002

Re: Overview and Abstract Data Model - new document

From: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 12:38:32 +0100
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20020730123701.037df4e0@127.0.0.1>
To: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
Cc: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, w3c-rdfcore-wg <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>

At 11:11 AM 7/30/02 +0100, Dave Beckett wrote:
> >>>Jeremy Carroll said:
> >
> > Dave
> > >>   We aren't normative on charmod.  or c14n?
> > Graham
> > > Currently, we *are* normative on these.
> >
> > Dave we did for a while have a crossed wire in the doc where we were citing
> > c14n rather than xc14n, that may have been your point of confusion on that
> > one.
> >
> > (xc14n depends on c14n so either way we *are* dependent on c14n :( ).
>
>And charmod?  If you add a dependency here - and it is an addition -
>it's to a WD, not a REC and it would be a new thing that RDF
>implementors would have to look at.  I'm pretty confident we decided
>not to depend on charmod in it's current non-REC state.

I don't know/recall the details of the discussion, but this is what the 
document says:

[[
4.1 Character normalization

[[[This subsection normatively depends on CHARMOD, currently a last call 
working draft. If CHARMOD has not reached the appropriate recommendation 
status as this document progresses down the recommendation track, this 
section will be deleted.]]]

For the processing of character data that can be represented in different 
ways, RDF processors are required to conform to Early Uniform 
Normalization, as described by Character Model for the World Wide Web 1.0 
[CHARMOD].
]]

I think the principle here was thrashed out with I18N folks (BICBW).

#g


-------------------
Graham Klyne
<GK@NineByNine.org>
Received on Tuesday, 30 July 2002 07:33:47 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:49:54 EDT