W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > July 2002

Re: Overview and Abstract Data Model - new document

From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 11:11:17 +0100
To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>, Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
Message-ID: <969.1028023877@hoth.ilrt.bris.ac.uk>

>>>Jeremy Carroll said:
> Dave
> >>   We aren't normative on charmod.  or c14n?
> Graham
> > Currently, we *are* normative on these.
> Dave we did for a while have a crossed wire in the doc where we were citing
> c14n rather than xc14n, that may have been your point of confusion on that
> one.
> (xc14n depends on c14n so either way we *are* dependent on c14n :( ).

And charmod?  If you add a dependency here - and it is an addition -
it's to a WD, not a REC and it would be a new thing that RDF
implementors would have to look at.  I'm pretty confident we decided
not to depend on charmod in it's current non-REC state.

Received on Tuesday, 30 July 2002 06:12:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:53:59 UTC