W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > July 2002

Re: Datatypes [Was: Minutes telecon 26th July 2002]

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: 28 Jul 2002 09:53:49 -0500
To: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
Cc: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1027868031.13440.1012.camel@dirk>

On Sun, 2002-07-28 at 03:38, Patrick Stickler wrote:
[...]
> > but there are
> > still three or four viable candidates:
> > 
> > - untidy
> > - tidy
> > - two properties
> 
> This has already been rejected by the WG.

I don't recall any such decision.

Giving your position on the issue is fine, but if
you're going to cite group decisions, please do
so by reference to the record.

[...]
> The WG has already decided that datatyping should work by one of the
> two proposed options,

which decision are you referring to here?

> based on the tidyness of literals, or lack
> thereof. 

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
see you in Montreal in August at Extreme Markup 2002?
Received on Sunday, 28 July 2002 10:53:32 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:49:53 EDT