- From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 22:10:24 +0300
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- CC: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
On 2002-07-28 17:53, "ext Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2002-07-28 at 03:38, Patrick Stickler wrote:
> [...]
>>> but there are
>>> still three or four viable candidates:
>>>
>>> - untidy
>>> - tidy
>>> - two properties
>>
>> This has already been rejected by the WG.
>
> I don't recall any such decision.
>
> Giving your position on the issue is fine, but if
> you're going to cite group decisions, please do
> so by reference to the record.
>
> [...]
>> The WG has already decided that datatyping should work by one of the
>> two proposed options,
>
> which decision are you referring to here?
>
>> based on the tidyness of literals, or lack
>> thereof.
Both at the Bristol face-to-face.
Patrick
--
Patrick Stickler Phone: +358 50 483 9453
Senior Research Scientist Fax: +358 7180 35409
Nokia Research Center Email: patrick.stickler@nokia.com
Received on Monday, 29 July 2002 15:10:31 UTC