Re: Datatypes [Was: Minutes telecon 26th July 2002]

On 2002-07-28 17:53, "ext Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org> wrote:

> 
> On Sun, 2002-07-28 at 03:38, Patrick Stickler wrote:
> [...]
>>> but there are
>>> still three or four viable candidates:
>>> 
>>> - untidy
>>> - tidy
>>> - two properties
>> 
>> This has already been rejected by the WG.
> 
> I don't recall any such decision.
> 
> Giving your position on the issue is fine, but if
> you're going to cite group decisions, please do
> so by reference to the record.
> 
> [...]
>> The WG has already decided that datatyping should work by one of the
>> two proposed options,
> 
> which decision are you referring to here?
> 
>> based on the tidyness of literals, or lack
>> thereof. 


Both at the Bristol face-to-face.

Patrick

--
               
Patrick Stickler              Phone: +358 50 483 9453
Senior Research Scientist     Fax:   +358 7180 35409
Nokia Research Center         Email: patrick.stickler@nokia.com