W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > January 2002

Re: review MT draft

From: <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 15:17:00 +0100
To: bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Cc: jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com, phayes@ai.uwf.edu, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <OFDD35B72E.C48D282C-ONC1256B4B.004B9FFC@bayer-ag.com>
a while ago, the only way I could make sense out of reification was

  <rdf:Statement rdf:about="http://example.org/stuff#S1">
    <rdf:subject>http://example.org/stuff#sky</rdf:subject>
    <rdf:predicate>http://example.org/stuff#color"</rdf:predicate>
    <rdf:object>http://example.org/stuff#blue</rdf:object>
  </rdf:Statement>

or in --ntriples

<http://example.org/stuff#S1> <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type>
  <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#Statement> .
<http://example.org/stuff#S1> <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#predicate>
  "http://example.org/stuff#color" .
<http://example.org/stuff#S1> <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#subject>
  "http://example.org/stuff#sky" .
<http://example.org/stuff#S1> <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#object>
  "http://example.org/stuff#blue" .

which is strange, no?

OK, I was completely wrong according to M&S, but at least I got
convinced about use/mention bugs/issues and I fully agree with DanC
[[
  the rdf:subject of "Mary likes Bob"
  should be a word that starts with M,
  not a female person.
]]

--
Jos

PS sorry about this quick answer, but I'm overwhelmed by other
   "bugs" (such as the wrong interpretation of cached resource expiration...)
Received on Thursday, 24 January 2002 09:21:33 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:43:58 EDT